OpenSolaris

Printable Version Enter a New Search
Bug ID 6190840
Synopsis recursive enable warnings can be confusing
State 3-Accepted (Yes, that is a problem)
Category:Subcategory utility:smf
Keywords smf-other | smf-use
Reported Against
Duplicate Of
Introduced In
Commit to Fix
Fixed In
Release Fixed
Related Bugs
Submit Date 4-November-2004
Last Update Date 30-January-2007
Description
# svcadm enable -r nfs/server
svc:/network/nfs/server:default requires one of:
  svc:/network/loopback
  svc:/network/physical
svc:/network/nfs/nlockmgr requires one of:
  svc:/network/loopback
  svc:/network/physical
svc:/network/nfs/status requires one of:
  svc:/network/loopback
  svc:/network/physical

This seems to be telling me that the recursive enabling might not work
since it can't work out which of a require_any group to enable. It seems
that this warning should first check if the group is satisfied already;
only if it's not, should it output this message.

sch says:

  I think so.  svcadm(1M) isn't smart like that yet.
 xxxxx@xxxxx.com 11/4/04 17:56 GMT
Work Around
N/A
Comments
N/A